Treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (2024)

Abstract

Keywords: cam-type impingement, hip arthroscopy, alpha angle, femoroplasty

Introduction

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a known cause of groin pain and a condition that can give rise to osteoarthritis of the hip (1). Patients suffering from this condition are mainly young and experience pain when the hip is moved through internal rotation and adduction at 90° of hip flexion. In this condition, in predisposed patients, anomalous contact between the femoral head-neck junction and acetabular rim develops. Although FAI had already previously been described as an entity, it was first properly defined and categorized by Ganz et al. (1), who distinguished between different types of FAI: cam, pincer and combined. In cam-type FAI the pathological contact is due to anatomical abnormality of the femur: in this type of FAI, the non-spherical morphology of the femoral head and the subsequent reduction of the femoral head-neck offset are responsible for abnormal contact between the acetabulum and the femur. Stulberg et al. (2) used the term ‘pistol-grip’ to define this deformity, and according to them it is present in 40% of patients who develop osteoarthritis of the hip. The cam-type deformity can also be secondary to diseases of the proximal femur typical of childhood, including sequelae of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease or Perthes-like deformities, and post-infectious and traumatic causes (3).

Femoroacetabular impingement is a dynamic pathology and its development is also related to intense sports activity (4, 5). Many patients with FAI may have developed significant secondary joint damage at a younger age when participating in sports, as a result of them pushing their bodies beyond the reduced physiological limits imposed by the altered joint morphology (6). Recent studies have stressed the high prevalence of FAI signs in asymptomatic populations based on previously described cut-off values (7–11). Sutter et al. (9) argue that alpha angle values do not ensure differentiation between the healthy population and affected patients, and suggested that alpha angle cut-off values should be increased. In a study by Lepage-Saucier et al. (7), the 95% reference interval limits calculated for the signs of FAI were all far beyond the abnormal thresholds found in the literature for cam-type FAI. In a magnetic resonance imaging study, using the predefined cut-off of 50.5, 14% of 200 volunteers had at least one hip with cam morphology (12).

The evidence emerging from the literature suggests that, in anatomically predisposed individuals, alterations in joint morphology (anatomical factors) can develop in relation to how they use their joints (environmental factors), leading to degenerative changes of the articular structures, responsible for the appearance of pain.

Femoroacetabular impingement can be treated with an open surgical procedure (involving dislocation of the hip) or with an arthroscopic procedure. In the case of surgical dislocation clinically relevant complications are reported to occur in 4.8% of patients. Severe complications are extremely rare but the demanding nature of the surgical procedure, the large incision and the long rehabilitation time mean that this surgery can feasibly be performed only by few operators and centers specializing in hip surgery (13). Otherwise, hip arthroscopy obtains an osseous correction of the cam deformity comparable to the correction obtained with open procedures, and potentially allows smaller incisions, shorter hospitalization, and faster rehabilitation. In addition hip arthroscopy appears to be safe (13).

The overall complication rate associated with hip arthroscopy has been reported to be 4.0% (95 % CI: 2.9–5.2%) with the vast majority of complications being non-life or limb threatening in nature (14). It is well established in the published literature, which includes a considerable number of patients, that most of the complications related to hip arthroscopy in general are related to patient positioning, traction and fluid management. Adequate padding of compression points on the perineum and the feet is the first step to the achievement of successful hip arthroscopy (15). However, hip arthroscopy is associated with a significant learning curve.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate preliminary clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic treatment of cam-type FAI. The hypothesis of the study was that arthroscopic treatment of cam-type FAI is an effective and safe procedure.

Methods

This study was approved by our institutional review board, and all the participants gave their informed consent. Between January 2009 and December 2012, 45 consecutive patients with a clinically and radiographically documented cam-type FAI were treated arthroscopically at our Institute. All the patients underwent a standardized diagnostic assessment, including an interview, physical examination and standard radiographs of the pelvis and hips. The criteria for eligibility to undergo arthroscopic treatment of cam-type FAI (inclusion criteria) were clinical signs of FAI (groin pain, positive anterior impingement test), an alpha angle superior to 50° on frog-leg radiographs, and a head-neck offset inferior to 8 mm, with a preserved joint space.

Results

Thirty-eight patients were included in the study. Seven patients were excluded because of previous surgery (revision surgery in two cases) or acetabular labral reconstruction with an ileo-tibial band autograft (three cases) or unavailability of correct pre and postoperative radiograph studies (two cases).

The patients were 22 men and 16 women with an average age of 44.4 years. The duration of their symptoms prior to surgical intervention averaged 31 months (range: 4–90 months).

The follow-up clinical evaluation (mHHS, administered as a telephone survey) was performed after a mean interval of 36 months (range: 21–60 months). The radiographic follow-up was obtained after an average of 12.7 months.

Thirty of the 38 patients (79%) were satisfied (S group) with the results of the arthroscopic procedure; two of these 30 patients subsequently underwent total hip arthroplasty (THR), but they were nevertheless satisfied with the arthroscopic osteochondroplasty as it reduced their pain and delayed THR. Eight patients were not satisfied (NS group) and seven of these also subsequently underwent THR. Three significant differences between these two groups of patients (S and NS) were recorded: a higher mean age in the NS group (NS= 48.8 years; S=43.3 years); a greater mean alpha angle in the NS group (NS = 81.2°; S= 73.2°), and a higher body mass index (BMI) in the NS group (NS = 28.3; S = 24.7).

The mean mHHS increase from the preoperative period to follow-up was 32.7 points. The mHHS increased in all the S group patients; in particular mHHS increased from an average of 52.9 preoperatively (range: 27.5–82.5) to an average of 85.6 at follow-up (range: 45.1–00.1). The pre and postoperative radiographic studies showed a statistically significant change in the mean alpha angle, from 69.7 ° preoperatively to 50.7° at follow-up (a mean reduction of about 19°); similarly, we recorded an increase in the head-neck offset, from a mean of 5.44 mm preoperatively to a mean of 7.76 mm at follow-up (a mean increase of 2.32 mm). Only one complication was observed: a case of pudendal neuropraxia that resolved spontaneously in six months.

Discussion

Our findings are comparable to those reported in recent systematic reviews evaluating the outcome of hip arthroscopy for FAI (16–18). Such studies have reported patient satisfaction rates of 65 to 85% at up to 40 months after surgery. We found a patient satisfaction rate of 79% at follow-up performed at an average of 36 months after arthroscopy. Moreover, the mean age of our cohort was 44.4 years, which is slightly older than in most studies in the literature. A notable finding in our study was the high rate of conversion to arthroplasty: 9 out of 38 (23.7%). The mean time to conversion to arthroplasty was 24.3 months after arthroscopy, with a range of 11 to 60 months.

We observed some differences between two groups of patients, those who were not satisfied and those who were satisfied with the procedure; in particular, the NS patients had a higher mean age (48.8 years) compared with the satisfied patients (43.3 years). McCormick et al. (16) suggested that age is a strong predictor of diminished surgical outcome, with worse outcomes in older patients.

The evidence from the literature indicates that surgery gives good results in patients with early degenerative changes of the hip. Philippon et al. (19), in a population of patients aged over 50 years, found that critical factors for poor results were a low preoperative mHHS and a joint space of 2 mm or less (at 3 years, patients with 2 mm or less showed a 43% rate of conversion to THR). In a systematic review by de Sa et al. (20) it was demonstrated that flexion and internal rotation are influenced by the amount of bone correction. An alpha angle correction to 55° or less is suggested as the target value to obtain good clinical outcomes. However, this applies less in patients with extensive articular damage or advanced osteoarthritis.

Another feature that distinguished the two groups in the present study was the higher mean alpha angle in the NS group. Beaulé et al. (21), in a study of 167 subjects, evaluated radiographic parameters like Wiberg’s angle, alpha angle and Tonnis grade on preoperative X-rays and also considered cartilage damage quantified intraoperatively using the Beck’s classification. They found that patients with cam-type FAI and an alpha angle of 65°or more are at increased risk of substantial cartilage damage while increasing acetabular coverage appears to have a protective effect. Other studies indicate that the presence of a cam deformity (as quantified by the alpha angle and head-neck offset) is an independent risk factor for the presence of acetabular cartilage damage and a predictor of the development of osteoarthritis (22, 23). Johnston et al. (23) found a significant association between grade of acetabular cartilage defects and degrees of alpha angle. In particular, in hips with grade IV acetabular chondral damage, the alpha angle was 10° greater than in the hips of patients with no acetabular defects. The alpha angle in patients with large acetabular chondral lesions was 14° greater than in patients without chondral defects.

The third characteristic that distinguished between the two groups in the present study was the higher BMI in the NS group. Moderate evidence for a positive association between obesity and the occurrence of hip osteoarthritis has been found (24). In particular, according to recent evidence, BMI should be considered a risk factor for the development of osteoarthritis independently of anatomical abnormalities of the proximal epiphysis of the femur (25).

In conclusion, a crucial aspect, in order to obtain good clinical outcomes of arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for the treatment of Cam-type impingement, is correct selection of patients who are likely to benefit from this kind of surgery. This means that it is necessary to be familiar with the clinical and radiographic parameters that can be considered risk factors for a rapid evolution to hip osteoarthritis. Hip arthroscopy should be avoided in patients aged over 50 years with risk factors for early osteoarthritis (high BMI and a significantly increased alpha angle).

References